How
Eve invented dualism1 “The right Way is the untrodden. It becomes the wrong Way when you’ve stepped on it.”
Harry Gato (1976) A few million years before time was invented, Eve2 opened her
eyes3 and saw4 she was in the
middle of nowhere, possibly in the middle of Africa. As far as she could see
stretched endless undifferentiated5 sameness.6 Horrified,7 she realised8 she was
nowhere and therefore a nobody.9 But Eve was an imaginative gal.10 To feel
better, she imagined11 that she needed to invent a somewhere
and by so doing become somebody. She collected some stones, called Adams, and laid
them in a circle. Then she stepped into the circle and, hallelujah, she was
somewhere and therefore a somebody.12 Within the 1st and
which was nowhere13,14 she had invented (indeed, bootstrapped) a 2nd
and which appears as a somewhere. 15,16,17 And that made her feel
very happy.18 However, she soon got bored19 because what
had seemed different now appeared as the same.20 So she began
to fill the empty space (i.e., the nowhere) within her somewhere with lots of
different, because new objects.21 And each time she did that22 she became
more of a somebody and felt a lot better. But even that wasn’t enough. Hence Eve began to
step outside (hence before) her somewhere23 and back into
nowhere and there invented/fantasized a new circle and so a new somewhere
that was different from her original somewhere.24 And she
continued inventing new somewheres and somebodys for several million years. The medieval
Indian Sri Yantra diagram, a true pataphysicon,25 was the most
abstract depiction of Eve’s action, meaning the invention of the realistic
fantasy (or idea) of life, hence of all lives, hence of life as such.26,27,28 But the horrible memory of having existed nowhere
as a nobody haunted her. So, to protect her offspring29 from the awful
experience of encountering nowhere and being nobodies
she gradually increased the height of the perimeter30 of her
somewhere so that the kids couldn’t look beyond. The upshot was that Eve’s kids, and who had
inherited her DNA, now invented pure reason which fantasized that because
they were in a somewhere there had to be either another, indeed an ‘other’ somewhere31 or a nowhere.
And because they could not escape their somewhere, though a few did,32 they invented
countless imaginary solutions about both the nowhere and other somewheres. In short, Eve’s kids upgraded themselves from
being mere dualistic metaphysicists to monistic pataphysicists by imagining and then turning their
fantasies into useful realities.33 |
Commentary 1. Two alternate versions
of this private (because invented by an individual) fantasy can be read in
the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad composed about 2500
years ago in India. For the medieval third Hindu version see below. 2. Eve is the
brogue translation of the Hebrew word/name Chavvah
meaning ‘the mother of all living’ and the Adam’s playmate. 3. In fact her eyes (just like her other sensing functions)
merely served as data/instruction collectors. The eye she opened was her
inner eye (i.e., her Third) that transformed her private responses (i.e., her
private imaginary solutions) to external data instructions into a cognisable
fantasy/dream (i.e., into a supplemental universe). 4. For all
variations of the word ‘see’ substitute
imagine, fantasize, idealize, fictionalize and so on. What an individual
‘sees’ happens as internal simulation in analogue of selected quantised
streams of quantised (i.e., digitised) data both internal and external. 5. Limitless,
boundless, hence not cognizable 6. Non-difference 7. Here ‘horror’
functions as a Guide & Control signal from her navigation system (i.e.,
brain) instructing her that her survival capacity (her self-preservation
capacity) had seriously diminished. 8. She awakened,
thereby becoming a Buddha. In fact, she awakened to the realization (i.e., a
supplemental universe) that she was dreaming, imagining and so on. 9. She was a
nobody because only difference (and she was alone, hence non-different) can
be cognised. Sameness (non-difference) is compressed out. In other words, to
realize ‘I AM’ (and which is the ultimate goal-as-side-effect (!!!) of existence)
she needed to invent herself as a somebody (i.e., as a differentiated, hence
cognizable One). 10. Eve, ‘The Mother
of all living’ (i.e., of all supplemental universes), operated the pataphysical procedure namely to imagine (i.e.,
bootstrap) a solution before realizing it as a cognizable and ‘fitter’
existent. Eve was the very first artist, namely the first human to apply
human (hence natural) artifice to bootstrap herself to a new response (hence
consciousness) state and personal survival capacity. She gave herself a
survival edge by inventing a more efficient (albeit recursive) survival
procedure. 11. She fantasised
(i.e., invented) an imaginary solution (hence a placebo) to make her feel
like somebody and therefore better. 12. By stepping
into the circle Eve had invented, bootstrapped TWO (dualism, relativity and
which affects (as 1)) from ONE (monism, singularity and which does not
affect). What Eve simply did, having first imagined it, was to draw an
arbitrary (because private, i.e., particular) line (as supplemental universe)
in the sand (read: chaos, the absurd), thereby inventing difference (i.e., dualism)
and thereby (relative) meaning. 13. The 1st
is the monist/singularity (hence initial or end @ equilibrium) state or monad
because lacking constraints/rules/boundaries that differentiate. The monist
position is unperturbed, i.e., @rest, therefore apolitical, hence useless as
survival/life initiator. 14. In the 1st
Upanishad the 1st (as monist imaginary solution) was named the
non-relative, absolute (and so on) nirguna Brahman
and nicknamed as the non-cognizable ‘The One without a Second.’ The nirguna Brahman represents the (pataphysicist’s)
individual (or monad) who is a law unto him/herself. 15. In the 1st
Upanishad the 2nd is the dynamic dualist (Sanskrit: dvaita) (to nth
elaboration) state because selectively and so relatively constrained. 16. In the 1st
Upanishad version the 2nd was named saguna Brahman. The latter represents all cognizable (as
realistic fantasies) supplemental universes, and which are imagined as
numberless. Because derived from the 1st (i.e., from the nirguna Brahman as emergent procedure that respnds to turbulence), every 2nd of n happens
as differential recursion. Hence the 1st can be inferred
(hypothetically) from the 1st . 17. The 2nd
Upanishad version of this ‘creation’ story names the nowhere (i.e.,
boundless. @rest sameness) ATMAN and the somewhere
(i.e., selectively constrained sameness, hence difference) atman. The Sanskrit word atman originally
meant ‘breath’, akin to the German word Atem, meaning breath). 18. Her
invention/fantasy (i.e., as imaginary solution) made (indeed was intended to
make) her happy and was, therefore, a placebo. 19. Because she
operates as a transient (thermo-)dynamic (quantum mechanical) system whereby
she and all her data/quanta decay (unless regenerated, recharged). Eve’s
unpleasant sense of boredom emerges as another warning signal from her
navigation system that she is decaying into sameness, hence that, lacking ‘difference
that makes a difference’, her survival capacity is diminishing. 20. Repetition,
rather than differential recursion, reduces difference to sameness. Only the
new (indeed the random), to wit, the next unpredictable step (as contact
event), is different, hence can impact as instruction. 21. Fantasized via sub
specie momenti as realistic objects,
somethings. 22. She either stacks
differential placebos upon differential placebos or nests placebos within
placebos, thereby staying dynamic/alive, i.e., as a cognizable and realistic
somebody. 23. By stepping
outside her fantasized somewhere, as supplemental universe, Eve triggers a momentary
NDE, i.e., a Near Death Experience, as in dreamless sleep. By
inventing/fantasizing a new somewhere/somebody as imaginary solution she
comes alive again (albeit in a dream), i.e., in dream-sleep. She awakens
fully when she realises (i.e., fantasises realistically) that she and her
world are both happening as a dream. 24. The somewhere/something invention procedure is blind, automatic
and recursive. Each new
somewhere is a differential application of the invention/creation/fantasizing
procedure. The more complex (and dense) her fantasy arrangements get the more
real, conscious (displaying as her fantasy stream) and substantial and happy
she feels. However, being dynamic, her original circle (her self-imposed
constraints or rules set, to wit, a Universal Truing Machine) and all
subsequent (or supplemental) circles decay and she as their side-effect with
it. 25. A pataphysicon is an imaginary solution, in other words a private
(or personal) fantasy or fiction. It prepares for transition into a realistic
supplementary world (Jarry). 26. Hindu
sannyasins seeking exit from life (samsara), for instance, as jivanmuktas,
focus on the empty space in the middle of the Yantra and then gradually
eliminate one triangle after another until their dream of life has ceased. 27. If the centre
of the Yantra contained a dot (or bindi, indeed,
any image (called Ishwara)) then the Yantra
functioned as political tool. 28. The Sri Yantra
is an early Hindu depiction of the abstract notion of recursion. The problem
was resolved with the ‘Two Truths’ theorem. 29. That
is to say, her differential (fractal) recursions as local
applications of the non-local emergent creation procedure. 30. i.e., the constraints,
rules, laws, boundaries, tabus that limit and so define. 31. They
bootstrapped the fantasy of dualism (or multi-differentialism)
and relativity from the fantasy of monism and equivalence. 32. The few who did
escape, and who were pataphysicists like Eve,
managed to do so by reducing their size, i.e., by zooming out the data
observation to maximum, thereby becoming so small that they could crawl out
between the perimeter stones (i.e., the Adams), or because they became adept
at satipathana (i.e., mindfulness) meditation.
Some, of course, completed the fête of escaping
from somewhere to nowhere, i.e., from difference to sameness, curtesy of an
actual or feigned (à le Ramana Maharshi) Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Others
still escaped because they understood recursion; other still by observing sub
specie aeternitatis. 33. The pataphysicists turned fictions into facts (because
observed sub specie momenti) for their own survival benefit and
happiness. |